Serious question: Has Ashton Kutcher come out with a new ‘Punked’ show aimed at Conservative Voters that I haven’t heard of? Does Lucy Van Pelt now intern for Ronna McDaniel?
Controlled opposition shills such as Ben Shapiro tell us we need better candidates to win elections. Our so-called ‘elected’ officials tell us to ‘vote harder’ next time. This is naïve at best and absolute gaslighting at worst. They are asking Conservatives to essentially “bring a vote to a cheat fight.” I will no longer participate in good faith in a contest where cheating is occurring. You know and I know that Sloth did not beat out Dr. Oz for the US Senate in Pennsylvania (on what planet did you think that sentence would ever be spoken?).
Oh, And Spare Us Your ‘Analysis’
When I see talking heads and other propagandists talking at us, their so-called ‘analysis’ tries to explain to us plebes “what went wrong.” But it is the framing of their questions that reveals the lie. They ask, “Why didn’t Republicans perform as expected?” But this implies that the failure was somehow our fault (e.g. bad candidates or not voting hard enough).
Here’s what you’ll never hear: “How in the hell did Democrats win with enthusiasm on the Right rivaled only by the Left’s rank criminality?” or “How is it possible that candidates who couldn’t fill a high school gym won so overwhelmingly…again?” This is the tell, patriot. They cheated, they KNOW they cheated, and this is why they frame their rhetoric the way they do.
Give us your over-taxed, over-regulated, your deplorables yearning to breathe free.
Here’s what we know: It simply does not matter how many voters participate when your enemy counts the votes. ‘Voting harder’ is not a strategy to win a fixed game. ‘Better candidates’ don’t win elections (just ask Dr. Oz how that worked in his rigged contest against Sloth).
One solution by Governor DeSantis was the implementation of a variety of election integrity measures which appears to have had great success. This, combined with refugees from California and New York, culminated in a successful election. How many accusations of cheating have you seen coming out of Florida as compared to Arizona?
Others such as Gab CEO, Andrew Torba, agree with my own thinking that we must create a parallel everything to combat the rigged system. It is the ultimate nullification. Who cares if Alameda, Portland or Chicago try to shutter your business when you are mobbed by Patriots throwing money at you when you ask for help? BreathEasy calls this a “BUYCOTT.” Talk about “power to the people…”
But isn’t there a third choice? If the Communists insist on cheating, their cheating removes any requirement for us to abide by the rules of the contest also. Their cheating has given us permission to join them in the cheat. And it is this choice that goes completely uncommented upon by ANY on the Right. If we truly want to wrest control from our rulers, shouldn’t we turn our elections into a ‘may the best cheater win’ scenario and beat them at their own game?
How to Create A Level Playing Field – The Lance Armstrong Stratagem
In an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2013, Lance Armstrong admitted to doping to win the Tour de France seven times. While his admission sent the world into a tizzy of scandal and comeuppance, Armstrong made two interesting statements that were completely uncommented upon by anyone.
Let’s see if you see now what I saw then:
“…Winfrey asked Armstrong whether his actions felt wrong, or whether he felt bad or whether they even felt like cheating. His answer to each of those questions: "No."
"I viewed it as a level playing field," he said.
And this gem:
“…He also said he didn't believe that it was possible to win seven titles without using drugs "in that culture."”
Do you see it?
Lance implied that he was not the only athlete cheating. He asserted that in order to have a chance of winning at all, doping was absolutely required. It was the “culture” of the Tour de France that required doping in order to be competitive at all. All poor Lance did was accept the premise.
Therefore, if we apply Armstrong’s choice to the criminally compromised elections of the American Empire, there is an argument that says, if you want to win a contest where your adversary cheats, you must join the criminals in their criminality. This, at least, would ‘level the playing field’ and turn the contest into a ‘may the best cheater win’ scenario. This solution states that we MUST cheat if we are to continue to play the game.
Many of my brethren on the Right will (and should) instinctively wince at such a suggestion. They would rightfully say, “cheating will make us no better than criminals” and “two wrongs don’t make a right.”
My cynical follow up to this would be: Sure, but how bad do you want to win?
Let’s look at why Lance made the choice he made. Lance claimed he doped because of his
"… ruthless desire to win"
Would we say that conservatives have a ‘ruthless desire to win?’ I think it’s obvious we have a STRONG desire to win, sure. You might even say we have a RIGHTEOUS desire to win. But we most definitely do not have a RUTHLESS desire to win.
However, the Communists unfortunately do. You and I both know that stripped of their power and influence, our enemies would find it mighty hard to get their (our!) chauffeured limos and private jets if they didn’t feel entitled to leverage any and every tool at their disposal to keep the shrimp cocktail flowing. It’s not like that Gender Studies degree from Vasser qualifies them for anything other than flipping burgers and organizing riots.
But here is where we find the flaw in Lance’s self-justification. His desire to ‘win’ at any cost (which included his honor) was what forced him to compromise his values. Looking from the outside in, the more honor-preserving choice for Lance might have been to simply not participate in a compromised contest.
So am I in favor of cheating harder than our Communist enemies? No. Above all else, we must maintain our honor and our right to hold our head up high. Our wins must be airtight. However, I am certainly NOT in favor of holding our head up high enough for it to be lopped off by the mob during our own American Reign of Terror that is most assuredly likely with this crop of latter day Robespierres.
But in a contest that is irreparably corrupted, there is no valid argument to continue to compete.
Our solution lies in pouring gas on what Governor DeSantis has recently merely toyed with. The 10th Amendment is, by a mile, the strongest of the Amendments contained within the American Constitution. It is also the small exhaust port on the Empire’s Election Fraud Space Station. Dare I say it is the BreathEasy solution implemented at the State level?
For those newcomers to Constitutional thinking, the 10th Amendment states quite simply:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
We have seen that criminals absolutely rely on the centralization of power within the Executive Branch to maintain their cheat. The 10th Amendment is the Patriot Governors’ tool to nullify federal criminality, illegal mandates or other usurpations and insults to a Free People.
Yes, they will rage and they will whine. They will call it a Constitutional Crisis and defend their central authoritarianism even if it means ruling over ashes afterwards. They will also demonstrate their belief that ‘might makes right.’
But the Free States of America will summarily ignore all of it. Every State in this Union of American States is a sovereign nation unto itself. We must relearn the notion of American ‘dual sovereignty.’ Our solution is not held in one election or a single savior individual. Our solution is generational and will take time until their criminality crumbles into a heap and nothing is left of it except for a footnote in a far-future history book and the echoes of long dead harpies.
We have our solution; in fact, we always did. We know that the Communists cannot and will not allow a fair election. It is time to leverage the 10th Amendment to its fullest expression and declare in one voice that we are not mere subdivisions of a federal empire. We are States, sovereign nations in our own right.
And when these newly minted ‘leaders’ attempt to exercise stolen authority, it will be met with a deafening indifference as we live our lives within our State borders and watch as our crops and our children take root and grow to feed our future, rooted in republican government, a Constitutional Rule of Law and a cherishing of Individual Liberty.